IJBA Volume 3, Issue 2, 2023
Entrepreneurial Leadership and Parents’ Private Schooling Intention: A Study in Malaysian Education Landscape
Tan Shin Mei, Dr. Kenny Cheah Soon Lee, Dr. Siaw Yan-Li
This study addresses a research gap in Malaysia’s private schooling sector by investigating how entrepreneurial leaders, specifically private school principals, influence parents’ attitudes and behaviors towards private education. The study aims to understand the implications of increasing social segregation due to the growth of private schools. It provides a unique perspective on how entrepreneurial principals shape parents’ intentions and actions regarding private schooling. The research employs qualitative methods, including interviews with private school principals, to gather insights directly from school leaders. The interviews are transcribed and analyzed using Atlas.ti software, revealing three main themes: “maintain,” “improve,” and “implement.” These themes highlight the importance of upholding the school’s reputation, enhancing educational quality and facilities, and using innovative strategies to attract and retain students. The study’s findings have significant implications for educational policies, shedding light on both the positive aspects of private schools and their potential impact on social segregation. The insights contribute to establishing a more accessible, comprehensive, and fair national school system. Moreover, the study advances the understanding and application of entrepreneurial leadership in Malaysia’s education landscape.
Keywords: entrepreneurial leadership, parents’ intention, parents’ behaviour, private school, school choice
List of references
Abdulkadiroǧlu, A., Pathak, P. A., Schellenberg, J., & Walters, C. R. (2020). Do parents value school effectiveness?†. American Economic Review, 110(5), 1502–1539. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20172040
Akmaliah, Z., Pihie, L., & Asimiran, S. (2014). Entrepreneurial leadership practices and school innovativeness. South African Journal of Education, 34(1), 1–11.
Anders, J., Green, F., Henderson, M., & Henseke, G. (2020). Determinants of private school participation: All about the money? British Educational Research Journal, 46(5), 967–992. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3608
Andersen, S. C. (2008). Private schools and the parents that choose them: Empirical evidence from the danish school voucher system. Scandinavian Political Studies, 31(1), 44–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2008.00195.x
Ariyani, D., Suyatno, & Zuhaery, M. (2021). Principal’s innovation and entrepreneurial leadership to establish a positive learning environment. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.1.63
Bagheri, A., & Harrison, C. (2020). Entrepreneurial leadership measurement: a multi-dimensional construct. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 27(4), 659–679. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2019-0027
Brauckmann, S., & Pashiardis, P. (2020b). Entrepreneurial leadership in schools: linking creativity with accountability. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 25(5), 787–801. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1804624
Davies, P., & Davies, N. M. (2014). Paying for quality? Associations between private school income, performance and use of resources. British Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3107
DeAngelis, C. A. (2017). Does Choice Matter for School Choice? An Instrumental Variables Analysis of the Effect of Choice on Parental Satisfaction in Charter Schools. SSRN Electronic Journal, February. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2911285
Ghavifekr, S., & Ramzy, M. I. (2020). Exploring effective leadership practices of private school principals to improve teachers’ academic excellence and students’ learning achievement. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(3), 123–156. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202009_65(3).0005
Ghazali, S. S., Kadir, S. A., Krauss, S. E., & Asimiran, S. (2022). The entrepreneurial leadership practices of Malaysian secondary school principals in fundraising. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 50(5), 851–870. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220949542
Hahn, Y., Wang, L. C., & Yang, H. S. (2018). Does greater school autonomy make a difference? Evidence from a randomized natural experiment in South Korea. Journal of Public Economics, 161(May), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.03.004
Henseke, G., Anders, J., Green, F., & Henderson, M. (2021). Income, housing wealth, and private school access in Britain. Education Economics, 29(3), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2021.1874878
Hisrich, R. D., & Kearney, C. (2017). Building an Innovative and Entrepreneurial Organization. Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 63–82. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506374512.n4
Hofflinger, A., Gelber, D., & Tellez Cañas, S. (2020). School choice and parents’ preferences for school attributes in Chile. Economics of Education Review, 74(May), 101946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.101946
Jheng, Y. jie, Lin, C. wen, Chang, J. C. chen, & Liao, Y. kuang. (2022). Who is able to choose? A meta-analysis and systematic review of the effects of family socioeconomic status on school choice. International Journal of Educational Research, 112(September 2020), 101943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101943
Kamaludin, F. S. (2020). Understanding Parental Choice For Private and National Schools in Malaysia and Its Implication for National Unity. May.
Kumar, D., & Choudhury, P. K. (2020). Determinants of Private School Choice in India: All about the Family Backgrounds? Journal of School Choice, 00(00), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2020.1852517
Malaysia Education Blueprint, M. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 – 2025. Education, 27(1), 1–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2020). Malaysia Educational Statistics.
Mohd Kasim, N., & Zakaria, M. N. (2019). the Significance of Entrepreneurial Leadership Towards Malaysian School Performance: Mediator By Empowerment. International Journal of Education,
Psychology and Counseling, 409–426. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijepc.4310035
Reimann, C. J., Schwarz, J., & Koinzer, T. (2021). Leadership and competition in the age of public and private school markets. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(3), 594–605. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-07-2019-0226
Renko, M., El Tarabishy, A., Carsrud, A. L., & Brännback, M. (2015). Understanding and measuring entrepreneurial leadership style. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12086
Rohde, L. A., Campani, F., Oliveira, J. R. G., Rohde, C. W., Rocha, T., & Ramal, A. (2019). Parental Reasons for School Choice in Elementary School: A Systematic Review. Journal of School Choice, 13(3), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2019.1643970
Sandybayev, A. (2019). Impact of Effective Entreprenerial Leadership Style on Organizational Performance: Critical Review. International Journal of Economics and Management, 1(1), 47–55.
Siddiqui, N. (2017). Parental education as a determinant of school choice: A comparative study of school types in Pakistan. Research in Education, 99(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034523717725862
Stevenson, H. H. (2000). Why Entrepreneurship Has Won! 1–8.
Timmons, J. A. (1978). Characteristics and Role Demands of Entrepreneurship. American Journal of Small Business, 3(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225877800300102
Ustinoff-brumbelow, R. (2019). Differeces in Private School Leadership Behaviours by Student Enrollment: A National Study.
Wibowo, A., & Saptono, A. (2018). Does entrepreneurial leadership impact on creativity and innovation of elementary teachers? Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 21(2), 1–9.
Influence of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Leadership Style, Flexibility and Technology Adoption to Perceived Success by Employees of Xpeng Motors, Guangzhou
Shen Yongjie, Nor Nazeranah Binti Omar Din, Nurhafizah Binti Zainal, Sujatha Balakrishna
This study examines the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and the level of perceived success among employees of Xpeng Motors, Guangzhou. In addition, the effect of organizational culture is examined as a mediator that influences the relationship. This study is conducted among 286 employees within a variety of different departments and levels including the top-level management, mid senior and entry level of Xpeng Motors, Guangzhou. The study had an 88.11% response rate, showing an acceptable level of participant interest and giving a sizable dataset for research. Set of questionnaires were used as a method to collect the data and analyzed by using statistical software of Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Respondents perceived a modest level of entrepreneurial orientation, organizational culture, and employees’ perceived success. Respondents’ judgments varied in relation to the variables associated to entrepreneurial orientation and organizational culture. There were significant positive relationships between employees perceived success and innovativeness, risk-taking, and proactiveness. There was also a substantial positive association between risk-taking and proactiveness. These findings imply that more success relates to greater degrees of innovativeness, risk-taking, and proactiveness, emphasizing the necessity of developing an innovative culture. The study’s regression model revealed a strong positive relationship between independent variables (entrepreneurial orientation) and the dependent variable (employees’ perceived success), suggesting innovativeness, risk-taking, and proactiveness had substantial positive effects on employees’ perceptions of their own success. Overall, the findings indicate that promoting entrepreneurial orientation, nurturing an innovative culture, and encouraging risk-taking and proactiveness can have a positive effect on organizational innovation performance and employees’ perceptions of their own success. These findings offer important insights for future research and discussions on the relationships and implications of organizations.
Keywords: Entrepreneurial orientation, perceived success, leadership style, flexibility, and technology adoption
List of references
Abo-Khalil, A. G., Abdelkareem, M. A., Sayed, E. T., Maghrabie, H. M., Radwan, A., Rezk, H., & Olabi, A. G. (2022). Electric vehicle impact on energy industry, policy, technical barriers, and power systems. International Journal of Thermofluids, 13, 100134.
Adam, A. (2020). Sample Size Determination in Survey Research. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 26, 90-97.
Ahuja, J., Dawson, L., & Lee, R. (2020). A circular economy for electric vehicle batteries: driving the change. Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law, 12(3), 235-250.
Anwar, M. B., Muratori, M., Jadun, P., Hale, E., Bush, B., Denholm, P., Ma, O., & Podkaminer, K. (2022). Assessing the value of electric vehicle managed charging: a review of methodologies and results [10.1039/D1EE02206G]. Energy & Environmental Science, 15(2), 466-498.
Dixit, S. K., & Singh, A. K. (2022). Predicting Electric Vehicle (EV) Buyers in India: A Machine Learning Approach. The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, 16(2), 221-238.
Govorova, A. V. (2023). History and Paradoxes of the Chinese Car Market: Eastern Strategies and the Asian Regulator. Stud Russ Econ Dev, 34(1), 150-158.
Graham, J. D., & Brungard, E. (2022). Affordable Electric Vehicles: Their Role in Meeting the U.S. Contribution to the Paris Climate Goals [Original Research]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10.
Hossain, M. S., Kumar, L., Islam, M. M., & Selvaraj, J. (2022). A Comprehensive Review on the Integration of Electric Vehicles for Sustainable Development. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2022, 3868388.
Hu, Y., Cheng, H., & Tao, S. (2017). Retired Electric Vehicle (EV) Batteries: Integrated Waste Management and Research Needs. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(19), 10927-10929.
Huang, S., Huang, Q., & Soetanto, D. (2022). Entrepreneurial orientation dimensions and the performance of high-tech and low-tech firms: A configurational approach. European Management Journal.
Huang, S. K., & Wang, Y.-L. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and innovation in small and medium enterprises. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 563-570.
Li, W., Yang, M., & Sandu, S. (2018). Electric vehicles in China. A review of current policies. Energy & Environment, 29(8), 1512-1524.
Lokesh, B., & Tay, J. (2017). A Framework for Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging in Singapore. Energy Procedia, 143, 15-20.
Manzano, G., & Ayala, J. (2020). Entrepreneurial Orientation: Its Relationship with the Entrepreneur’s Subjective Success in SMEs. Sustainability, 12, 4547.
Qiu, L.-S., Yang, D.-X., Hong, K.-R., Wu, W.-P., & Zeng, W.-K. (2021). The Prospect of China’s Renewable Automotive Industry Upon Shrinking Subsidies [Policy Brief]. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9.
Rigtering, J., Kraus, S., Eggers, F., & Jensen, S. (2014). A Comparative Analysis of the Entrepreneurial Orientation/Growth Relationship in Service Firms and Manufacturing Firms. The Service Industries Journal, 34.
Su, Z., Xie, E., & li, Y. (2011). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance in New Ventures and Established Firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 49.
Tajudin, A., Aziz, R., Mahmood, R., & Abdullah, M. H. (2014). The Relationship between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance of SMEs in Malaysia. International Journal of Management Excellence, 2, 221.
Teece, D. J. (2019). China and the Reshaping of the Auto Industry: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. Management and Organization Review, 15(1), 177-199.
Vishal, G., & Gupta, A. (2014). Relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in large organizations over time. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 13, 7-27.
Wang, H., Feng, K., Wang, P., Yang, Y., Sun, L., Yang, F., Chen, W.-Q., Zhang, Y., & Li, J. (2023). China’s electric vehicle and climate ambitions jeopardized by surging critical material prices. Nature Communications, 14(1), 1246.
Weinzimmer, L. G., Michel, E. J., & Robin, J. (2021). The nature of entrepreneurial orientation strength: the impact of shared values on firm performance. Journal of Management & Organization, 27(4), 715-735.
Weiss, M., Zerfass, A., & Helmers, E. (2019). Fully electric and plug-in hybrid cars – An analysis of learning rates, user costs, and costs for mitigating CO(2) and air pollutant emissions. J Clean Prod, 212, 1478-1489.
Zhao, F., Liu, X., Zhang, H., & Liu, Z. (2022). Automobile Industry under China’s Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality Goals: Challenges, Opportunities, and Coping Strategies. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 5834707.